4.6 Article

Trade Openness and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Belt and Road Countries

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11092682

关键词

trade openness; carbon emissions; economic growth; Belt and Road; EKC

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71774071, 71690241, 71810107001, 71834003, 71673230]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M601568]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA20040400]
  4. Soft Science Project in Zhenjiang [YJ2018004]
  5. Young Academic Leader Project of Jiangsu University [5521380003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The search for a green and low-carbon economy has been a guide to current energy and environmental research. Using current panel cointegration approaches, our study examines the interaction between trade and an environmental pollution proxy of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by integrating economic growth and energy usage as major potential determining factors in this relationship for 49 high-emission countries in Belt and Road regions over the period of 1991-2014. For a robust analysis, we further grouped these countries into income panels (high, middle, low) and various regions (East Asia, Southeast Asia, Central Asia, South Asia, the Middle East/Africa, and Europe). The results of the panel cointegration tests revealed that the four variables were stationary in the long run. Similarly, our panel results indicated that trade openness had both positive and negative impacts on environmental pollution, but the effect varied in these different groups of nations. The results of the vector error correction model (VECM) causality also showed a long-run causal effect between trade, economic growth, energy consumption, and environmental pollution in the Belt and Road, Europe, high-income, middle-income, and low-income panels. The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) results further indicated the existence of an inverted U-form relationship between trade and carbon emissions. Finally, certain policy implications are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据