4.6 Article

Assessing the Health Vulnerability Caused by Climate and Air Pollution in Korea Using the Fuzzy TOPSIS

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11102894

关键词

fuzzy TOPSIS; climate change; air pollution; ozone; vulnerability assessment; human health impact

资金

  1. Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) as the Graduate School specialized in Climate Change
  2. National Strategic Project-Fine particle of the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT(MSIT)
  3. Ministry of Environment(ME)
  4. Ministry of Health and Welfare(MOHW) [2018M3D8A1065815]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of climate change and air pollution on health have become major topics of discussion and conducting an assessment on the vulnerabilities of climate change is essential to providing a solution for it. This study assesses human vulnerability to the health effects of climate change and ozone. We classified 27 detailed vulnerability indicators into eight categories and assessed the vulnerability of 249 jurisdictions in South Korea by applying the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Situation method. The results indicated that metropolitan and major urban areas were more vulnerable than other areas. Furthermore, factors such as air pollution, meteorological conditions, a vulnerable environment, the distribution of disease, health/medical capacities, and air pollution control had a significant impact on vulnerability. A validity analysis was on the vulnerability assessment results and the number of new patients diagnosed with diseases associated with the cardiovascular system; the results indicated a 66.9% correlation, signifying a considerably high validity. The proposed method for assessing vulnerabilities in terms of the health effects of air pollution is objective and based on data; thus, it is expected to present a high degree of applicability. The results can also be a critical foundation upon which to establish health policies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据