4.6 Review

A Review and Evaluation of Circular Business Model Innovation Tools

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11082210

关键词

circular economy; business models; literature review; practice review; business model innovation; innovation tools; circular business model tools; product service systems; PSS; circular business model experimentation

资金

  1. Mistra REES (Resource Efficient and Effective Solutions) program - Mistra (The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research)
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 'Circular business models for the solar power industry'-CIRCUSOL [776680]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [776680] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The circular economy has been heralded as a potential driver for sustainable development by business, academia, and policymakers. In a future circular economy, new business models are needed that slow, close and narrow resource loops to address key resource and climate challenges. After a phase of excitement and inspiration, an operationalization phase needs to start to ensure the best possible implementation and transition towards a circular economy. This operationalization phase will involve the development of products, processes and business models that significantly lower the negative impact on the environment, reduce waste and resource pressures and, rather, create a positive impact on society and environment. This paper focuses on the circular business model lens as a comprehensive way of addressing business innovation. Within this evolving circular economy operationalization phase, several tools, approaches and methods are emerging that could support circular business model innovation. This paper seeks to create a comprehensive tools overview through a literature and practice review. It provides structure to the emerging range of tools, methods and approaches, and, based on this, a guideline for future tool development. Finally, it gives an overview of opportunities and gaps as well as a future agenda for research and practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据