4.8 Article

Interfacial charge behavior modulation in 2D/3D perovskite heterostructure for potential high-performance solar cells

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 715-720

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.069

关键词

2D/3D perovskite heterostructure; Charge recombination center; First-principle calculations; Energy level arrangement

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0206600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673214, 51773045]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622599]
  4. Key Projects of Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan [2017GK2231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2D/3D perovskite heterostructure can combine the advantages of 2D perovskite with well stability and 3D perovskite with high efficiency. 2D BA(2)PbI(4)/3D MAPbI(3) heterostructures are constructed to study the interfacial electrical properties and charge transfer characteristics by first-principle calculations. 3D MAPbI(3) perovskite have two kinds of contacting interface, i.e., PbI interface and I interface. The 2D/3D interface heterostructures are van der Waals contacting, and their light absorption can be enhanced as compared to pure 2D or 3D perovskite, mainly resulting from 3D perovskite part in the heterostructure. In 2D/I interface heterostructure, the band gap is 1.15 eV, and the charge recombination center is at 2D BA(2)PbI(4 )interface, which favor to improve the power conversion efficiency (PCE). While in 2D/PbI heterostructure, the band gap is as small as 0.53 eV, and the charge recombination center is at PbI interface, leading to a large number of recombination and low PCE. The work function difference of 2D BA(2)PbI(4) and 3D MAPbI(3) perovskite is the nature of energy level shifting and interface charge oriented movement. These results demonstrate that the construction of 2D BA(2)PbI(4) and 3D I interface heterostructure by interfacial engineering is a potential strategy to enhance the performance of the 2D/3D heterostructured PSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据