4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Pyro-electrolytic water splitting for hydrogen generation

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 183-191

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.030

关键词

Water splitting; Pyroelectric; External power source; H-2 generation

资金

  1. European Research Council, United Kingdom under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant [320963]
  2. Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom [RPG-2018-290]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University, China Changsha, China [621011812]
  4. EPSRC [EP/R035407/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water splitting by thermal cycling of a pyroelectric element that acts as an external charge source offers an alternative method to produce hydrogen from transient low-grade waste heat or natural temperature changes. In contrast to conventional energy harvesting, where the optimised load resistance is used to maximise the combination of current and voltage, for water splitting applications there is a need to optimise the system to achieve a sufficiently high potential difference for water electrolysis, whilst also maintaining a high current output. For the thermal harvesting system examined here, a high impedance 0.5 M KOH electrolyte with working electrodes connected to a rectified pyroelectric harvester produced the highest voltage of 2.34 V, which was sufficient for H-2 generation. In addition to electrolyte concentration, the frequency of the temperature oscillations was examined and reducing the heating-cooling frequency led to a larger change in temperature to generate increased pyroelectric charge and a higher potential difference for pyro-water splitting. Finally, in the absence of sacrificial reagents, cyclic production of H-2 (0.654 mu mol/h) was demonstrated for the optimised processing parameters of electrolyte and thermal cycling frequency using the external pyroelectric element as a charge source for water splitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据