4.8 Article

Creating oxygen-vacancies in MoO3-x nanobelts toward high volumetric energy-density asymmetric supercapacitors with long lifespan

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 455-465

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.071

关键词

MoO3; Vacancy; Supercapacitor; Energy density; Volumetric performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21571040]
  2. Young Top-Notch Talent of National Ten Thousand Talent Program
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [QC2017007]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, we present the synthesis of oxygen vacancies-rich alpha-MoO3-x nanobelts through a novel defect-engineering strategy. The oxygen-vacancies could not only greatly increase the interlayer spacing and the electrical conductivity of MoO3, but also significantly enhance the electrochemical activity, which promotes faster charge storage kinetics. Meanwhile, to further facilitate the electron transfer and ion transport, a graphene nanomeshcarbon nanotube/MoO3-x (GC/MoO3-x) nanocomposite with three-dimensional sandwiched structure was fabricated, which displays high specific capacity up to 306 C g(-1) as well as high volumetric capacity of 692 C cm(-3). Our fabricated asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) with the GC/MoO3-x and GC/MnO2 nanocomposites as anode and cathode, respectively, exhibits an ultrahigh energy of 150 Wh kg(-1), corresponding to an impressive volumetric energy density of 319 Wh L-1. Notably, both the gravimetric and volumetric energy densities are much higher than most of the previously reported metal oxide based ASCs in aqueous electrolytes. Furthermore, the ASC displays an ultra-long lifespan with 101% retention ratio after 30,000 cycles. The outstanding performances of GC/MoO3-x composite render it a highly promising candidate for next-generation supercapacitors with both high energy and power densities in future applications, especially in greatly limited space.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据