4.7 Article

The influence of exposure to immunosuppressive treatment during pregnancy on renal function and rate of apoptosis in native kidneys of female Wistar rats

期刊

APOPTOSIS
卷 21, 期 11, 页码 1240-1248

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10495-016-1281-y

关键词

Immunosuppressive drugs; Kidney; Pregnancy; Transplantation; Wistar rats

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pregnancy puts a significant additional strain on kidneys. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of immunosuppressive drugs on changes in native kidneys in female Wistar rats after exposure during pregnancy. The study was conducted on 32 dams, subjected to immunosuppressive regimens commonly used in the therapy of human kidney transplant recipients (cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone; tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone; cyclosporine A, everolimus and prednisone). The animals received drugs for 2 weeks before pregnancy and during 3 weeks of pregnancy. In all treated dams lower body weight (but not kidney mass) and alterations in serum sodium and chloride ions were found; serum creatinine concentration was increased in dams treated with cyclosporine A, everolimus and prednisone. All treatment groups of dams showed increased apoptosis in the distal tubules. In histological examination the changed intensity of acidophilic or basophilic cytoplasm of epithelial cells was found in kidneys of rats treated with calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. All immunosuppressive regimens caused abnormalities affecting nephron tubules. Regimens containing calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil caused higher rate of apoptosis and more pronounced histopathological changes. Regimen based on everolimus despite the lower rate of apoptosis in the proximal tubules and lower accumulation of kidney injury markers revealed higher serum creatinine concentration. Thus, interpretation which combination of drugs is better or worse for long-lasting functioning of kidneys in pregnant females requires further studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据