4.6 Article

Co3O4 modified Ag/g-C3N4 composite as a bifunctional cathode for lithium-oxygen battery

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 185-193

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.05.018

关键词

Lithium-oxygen batteries; Cathode material; Electrocatalyst; Oxygen reduction reaction; Oxygen evolution reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51472070, 51872071]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [172731]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rechargeable lithium-oxygen (Li-O-2) batteries have appeal to enormous attention because they demonstrate higher energy density than the state-of-the-art Li-ion batteries. Whereas, their practical application is impeded by several challenging problems, such as the low energy round trip efficiencies and the insufficient cycle life, due to the cathode passivation caused by the accumulation of discharge products. Developing efficient catalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions is effective to reduce the overpotentials in Li-O-2 cells. In our work, we report a Co3O4 modified Ag/g-C3N4 nanocomposite as a bifunctional cathode catalyst for Li-O-2 cells. The g-C3N4 substrate prevents the accumulation of Ag and Co3O4 nanoparticles and the presence of Ag NPs improves the surface area of g-C3N4 and electronic conductivity, significantly improving the oxygen reduction/evolution capabilities of Co3O4. Due to a synergetic effect, the Ag/g-C3N4/Co3O4 nanocomposite demonstrates a higher catalytic activity than each individual constituent of Co3O4 or Ag/g-C3N4 for the ORR/OER on as catalysts in Li-O-2 cells. As a result, the Ag/g-C3N4/Co3O4 composite shows impressive electrochemical performance in a Li-O-2 battery, including high discharge capacity, small gap between charge and discharge potential, and high cycling stability. (C) 2019 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据