4.7 Article

Optimization of bio-oil yields by demineralization of low quality biomass

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 105-115

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.09.004

关键词

Demineralization; Biomass pretreatment; Water washing; Acid washing; Biomass pyrolysis; Bio-oil

资金

  1. EU under the frame of the FP7 funded CAScade deoxygenation process using tailored nanoCATalysts for the production of BiofuELs from lignocellullosic biomass - CASCATBEL project [604307]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignocellulosic biomass contains inorganic elements (ash) that are known to act catalytically during fast pyrolysis and result in a decrease of the process' selectivity towards the desired liquid product. In this work, the removal of inorganic elements from two forestry residues, two agricultural residues and two energy crops was studied with the aim to maximize the liquid product yield from the fast pyrolysis process. The biomass samples were washed with water and solutions of nitric or acetic acid and the effects of time, temperature, acid type and acid concentration in the washing solution were studied. The original and the pretreated biomass samples were then pyrolyzed in a bench-scale fixed bed reactor in order to investigate the effects of the demineralization on the yields and composition of the pyrolysis products. Washing with water was effective for the removal of up to 42% of the inorganics in the biomass samples, whereas washing with acidic solutions achieved inorganics removal higher than 90%. The most important factor during the biomass pretreatment proved to be the washing temperature; higher temperatures (50 degrees C) were more effective for the removal of the inorganics than room temperature. The type of acid used in the washing solution was also an important factor, as nitric acid proved to be more effective than acetic acid. In the pyrolysis experiments, the demineralized biomass samples yielded less gas products and solid residue, while the selectivity towards the liquid product was substantially increased in all cases. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据