4.2 Article

Ephrins and Eph Receptor Signaling in Tissue Repair and Fibrosis

期刊

CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REPORTS
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11926-019-0825-x

关键词

Ephrins; Eph receptor; Ephrin-B2; Fibrosis

资金

  1. Arthritis Society (Canada)
  2. NIH [R01 HL147059-01]
  3. Start-up Package by Massachusetts General Hospital
  4. Scleroderma Foundation New Investigator Grant
  5. cleroderma Research Foundation Investigator Initiated Research Grant
  6. American Thoracic Society Foundation/Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Research Grant
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim
  8. Unity Biotechnology
  9. Indalo Therapeutics
  10. Canada Research Chairs Progra
  11. Canadian Institute of Health Research
  12. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  13. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  14. Krembil Foundation
  15. Stem Cell Network
  16. Toronto General and Western Hospital Foundation
  17. Arthritis Program, University Health Network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of Review Fibrosis is a pathological feature of many human diseases that affect multiple organs. The development of anti-fibrotic therapies has been a difficult endeavor due to the complexity of signaling pathways associated with fibrogenic processes, complicating the identification and modulation of specific targets. Evidence suggests that ephrin ligands and Eph receptors are crucial signaling molecules that contribute to physiological wound repair and the development of tissue fibrosis. Here, we discuss recent advances in the understanding of ephrin and Eph signaling in tissue repair and fibrosis. Recent Findings Ephrin-B2 is implicated in fibrosis of multiple organs. Intercepting its signaling may help counteract fibrosis. Summary Ephrins and Eph receptors are candidate mediators of fibrosis. Ephrin-B2, in particular, promotes fibrogenic processes in multiple organs. Thus, therapeutic strategies targeting Ephrin-B2 signaling could yield new ways to treat organ fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据