4.5 Article

Gold nano particles synthesized from Strychni semen and its anticancer activity in cholangiocarcinoma cell (KMCH-1)

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1594860

关键词

AuNPs; Strychni Semen; KMCH-1 cells; cholangiocarcinoma cell

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81660399, 81860423]
  2. Innovative Research Team Project of Yunnan Province [2015HC033]
  3. Yunnan Provincial Academician Workstation of Xiaoping Chen [2017IC018]
  4. Breeding Program for Major Scientific and Technological Achievements of Kunming Medical University [CGYP201607]
  5. Medical Leading Talent Project of Yunnan Province [L201622]
  6. Yunnan Provincial Clinical Center of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanotechnology has been materialized as a proficient technology for the development of anticancer nanoparticles all the way through an environment-friendly approach. Conventionally, nanoparticles have been assembled by dissimilar methods, but regrettably rely on the negative impact on the natural environment. Amalgamation of nanoparticles by means of plant extract is alternate conservative methods. In the present study, we equipped gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) from Strychni semen; displayed as a less toxic and environment-friendly. Integration of AuNPs was famed by UV-absorbance which displays peak values. Moreover, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) substantiate the shape of the AuNPs in the combined materials. FTIR results exhibit the active molecules positioned in the flat surface of the AuNPs. Similarly, the anticancer effectiveness of AuNPs is considered in KMCH-1 cells. Also, AuNPs successfully aggravate cytotoxicity and apoptosis by conjugating apoptotic gene expressions in KMCH-1 cells. Eventually, our results confirm the synthesis of AuNPs from Strychni Semen shows anticancer effects with environment-friendly manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据