4.6 Article

Development of a General Evaluation Metric for Rapid Screening of Adsorbent Materials for Postcombustion CO2 Capture

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 13, 页码 11529-11539

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01418

关键词

Carbon dioxide; Adsorption; Molecular simulation; Pressure swing adsorption; Multiscale modeling

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1604890]
  2. Office of the Provost [p20777]
  3. Office for Research [p20777]
  4. Northwestern University Information Technology [p20777]
  5. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - the Ministry of Education [NRF-2016R1D1A1B03934484]
  6. National Institute of Supercomputing and Network/Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information [KSC-2016-S1-0022]
  7. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P20777] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular simulations are combined with macroscopic pressure swing adsorption (PSA) modeling and process optimization to screen similar to 2900 metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for their suitability in separating CO2 from N-2 under conditions of interest in postcombustion CO2 capture. The hierarchical screening process eliminates MOFs based on metal price, new heuristics based on the internal energy of adsorption, full PSA modeling and optimization, and other factors. Based on PSA modeling of 190 materials, a general evaluation metric (GEM) is developed that can approximately rank the performance of adsorbent materials as defined by the lowest cost for postcombustion CO2 capture. The metric requires only isotherm data and the N-2 internal energy of adsorption. The N-2 working capacity is the most important component of the metric, followed by the CO2 working capacity, the CO2/N-2 selectivity at desorption conditions, and the N-2 internal energy of adsorption. Additional analysis shows that the correlation between the cost of CO2 capture and the GEM is better than that of other existing evaluation metrics reported in the literature. For the most promising MOFs, the cost to capture a tonne of CO2 is estimated to be $30-$40 plus the cost of compressing the CO2 product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据