4.6 Article

Remarkable Enhancement in Solar Oxygen Evolution from MoSe2/Ag3PO4 Heterojunction Photocatalyst via In Situ Constructing Interfacial Contact

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 8466-8474

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00252

关键词

MoSe2; Ag3PO4; Heterojunction; Photocatalytic oxygen evolution; Cocatalyst

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672113]
  2. Start-up Fund for High-Level Talents, Nanjing Forestry University
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20171299]
  4. Education Department of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exploring low-cost and earth-abundant cocatalysts is important for developing an efficient photocatalytic system for water splitting. Herein, we report a hybrid photocatalyst consisting of Ag-3 PO4 nanoparticles in situ grown on the surface of two-dimensional MoSe2 nanoarchitectures acting as a noble-metal-free cocatalyst for photocatalytic oxygen evolution under LED-light irradiation. The MoSe2/Ag3PO4 heterojunctions exhibited an obviously enhanced activity for photocatalytic O-2 generation compared with pure Ag3PO4 or the physical mixed samples with the same component, and the MoSe2/Ag3PO4 composite with an optimal ratio of cocatalysts demonstrated the highest O-2 evolution rate of 182 mu mol.L-1.g(-1).h(-1). The highly photocatalytic performance could be mainly ascribed to the formation of close and large contact interface between MoSe2 and Ag3PO4 via in situ preparation method, leading to ultrafast interfacial charge migration and highly efficient charge separation. More importantly, introduction of MoSe2 cocatalyst not only could promote light harvesting and provide more active adsorption sites, but also prevent the photocorrosion of the Ag3PO4 during the photocatalytic reaction. This work may open up new insights for the introduction of a noble-metal-free MoSe2 as an effective cocatalyst for solar energy conversion to achieve O-2 generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据