4.7 Article

Toxicity Studies of Chanoclavine in Mice

期刊

TOXINS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins11050249

关键词

chanoclavine; toxicology; subchronic feeding study; acute toxicity; endophyte; Epichloe

资金

  1. New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment [C10X0807, C10X1403]
  2. Grasslanz Technology Ltd.
  3. New Zealand Foundation for Arable Research
  4. Australian Grains Research and Development Corporation
  5. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [C10X1403, C10X0807] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epichloe endophytes have been used successfully in pastoral grasses providing protection against insect pests through the expression of secondary metabolites. This approach could be extended to other plant species, such as cereals, reducing reliance on pesticides. To be successful, the selected endophyte must express secondary metabolites that are active against cereal insect pests without any secondary metabolite, which is harmful to animals. Chanoclavine is of interest as it is commonly expressed by endophytes and has potential insecticidal activity. Investigation of possible mammalian toxicity is therefore required. An acute oral toxicity study showed the median lethal dose of chanoclavine to be >2000 mg/kg. This allows it to be classified as category 5 using the globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals, and category 6.1E using the New Zealand Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) hazard classes, the lowest hazard class under both systems of classification. A three-week feeding study was also performed, which showed chanoclavine, at a dose rate of 123.9 mg/kg/day, initially reduced food consumption but was resolved by day seven. No toxicologically significant effects on gross pathology, histology, hematology, or blood chemistry were observed. These experiments showed chanoclavine to be of low toxicity and raised no food safety concerns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据