4.7 Article

Sea State Bias Variability in Satellite Altimetry Data

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs11101176

关键词

sea state bias; sea level; significant wave height

资金

  1. Guangdong Special Fund Program for Marine Economy Development [GDME-2018B001]
  2. Dayu Scholar Program
  3. CAS (Chinese Academy of Sciences) 100 Talent Program [Y9KY04101L]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China [41606200]
  5. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC1401008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sea State Bias (SSB) contributes to global mean sea level variability and it needs cm-level range adjustment due to the instrumental drift over time. To investigate its variations and correct the global and regional sea level trend precisely, we calculate the temporal and spatial variability of the SSB correction in TOPEX, Jason-1, Jason-2 and Jason-3 missions, separately, as well as in the combined missions over the period 1993-2017. The long-term trend in global mean operational 2D non-parametric SSB correction is about -0.03 +/- 0.03 mm/yr, which accounts for 1% of current global mean sea level change rate during 1993-2016. This correction contributes to sea level change rates of -1.27 +/- 0.21 mm/yr and -0.26 +/- 0.13 mm/yr in TOPEX-A and Jason-2 missions, respectively. The global mean SSB varies up to 7-10 mm during the very strong ENSO events in 1997-1998 and 2015-2016. Furthermore, the TOPEX SSB trend, which is consistent with recently reported sea level trend drift during 1993-1998, may leak into the determined global sea level trend in the period. Moreover, the Jason-1/2 zonal SSB variability is highly correlated with the significant wave height (SWH). On zonal average, SSB correction causes about 1% uncertainty in mean sea level trend. At high SWH regions, the uncertainties grow to 2-4% near the 50 degrees N and 60 degrees S bands. This should be considered in the study of regional sea level variability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据