4.7 Article

A Building Detection Method Based on Semi-Suppressed Fuzzy C-Means and Restricted Region Growing Using Airborne LiDAR

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs11070848

关键词

airborne LiDAR; building detection; fuzzy C-means; region growing; filtering

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0504500]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41601504, 61378078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Building detection using airborne Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) data is the essential prerequisite of many applications, including three-dimensional city modeling. In the paper, we propose a coarse-to-fine building detection method that is based on semi-suppressed fuzzy C-means and restricted region growing. Based on a filtering step, the remaining points can be separated into two groups by semi-suppressed fuzzy C-means. The group contains points that are located on building roofs that form a building candidate set. Subsequently, a restricted region growing algorithm is implemented to search for more building points. The proposed region growing method perfectly ensures the rapid growth of building regions and slow growth of non-building regions, which enlarges the area differences between building and non-building regions. A two-stage strategy is then adopted to remove tiny point clusters with small areas. Finally, a minimum bounding rectangle (MBR) is used to supplement the building points and refine the results of building detection. Experimental results on five datasets, including three datasets that were provided by the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) and two Chinese datasets, verify that most buildings and non-buildings can be well separated during our coarse building detection process. In addition, after refined processing, our proposed method can offer a high success rate for building detection, with over 89.5% completeness and a minimum 91% correctness. Hence, various applications can exploit our proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据