4.7 Article

Biosourced Disposable Trays Made of Brewer's Spent Grain and Potato Starch

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym11050923

关键词

starch; disposable trays; biosourced; brewers ' spent grain; beeswax; chitosan; gelatin; glyoxal

资金

  1. Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy - LEPABE - FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [UID/EQU/00511/2019]
  2. project LEPABE-2-ECO-INNOVATION - Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-use plastic items made of non-biodegradable and fossil-based materials have been identified as a major environmental problem in modern society. Food packaging materials represent an important fraction of these, and replacement with biosourced, sustainable and low-cost alternatives, is a key priority. In the present work, and for the first time, trays suitable for some food packaging applications were produced by the hot-pressing of brewer's spent grains (BSG, a low added-value byproduct of the beer industry), bound with potato starch. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) trays were used as reference, since this material has been widely used in food packaging trays. The results demonstrated that all trays produced with varying proportions of BSG and potato starch have appropriate flexural strength, with values ranging between 1.51 +/- 0.32 MPa, for 80% BSG content, and 2.62 +/- 0.46 MPa, for 40% BSG content, which is higher than for EPS, 0.64 +/- 0.50 MPa. Regardless of BSG content, flexural strength and modulus decreased significantly after contact with water, due to starch plasticization, attaining values below EPS. Trays produced with 60% BSG, and also with the addition of chitosan and glyoxal presented the highest flexural strength, both before and after contact with water, 3.75 +/- 0.52 MPa and 0.44 +/- 0.11 MPa, respectively. The latter is reasonably close to the reference value obtained for EPS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据