4.7 Article

Polyhexamethylene Biguanide:Polyurethane Blend Nanofibrous Membranes for Wound Infection Control

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym11050915

关键词

PHMB; polyhexanide; wound dressing; polyhexamethylene biguanide; polyurethane; electrospinning; nanofibres; antimicrobial; antiseptic

资金

  1. BBSRC-LIDO DTP studentship [1764829]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (United Kingdom, EPSRC) [EP/L020904/1, EP/M026884/1, EP/R02961X/1]
  3. BBSRC [1764829] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) is a broad-spectrum antiseptic which avoids many efficacy and toxicity problems associated with antimicrobials, in particular, it has a low risk of loss of susceptibility due to acquired antimicrobial resistance. Despite such advantages, PHMB is not widely used in wound care, suggesting more research is required to take full advantage of PHMB's properties. We hypothesised that a nanofibre morphology would provide a gradual release of PHMB, prolonging the antimicrobial effects within the therapeutic window. PHMB:polyurethane (PU) electrospun nanofibre membranes were prepared with increasing PHMB concentrations, and the effects on antimicrobial activities, mechanical properties and host cell toxicity were compared. Overall, PHMB:PU membranes displayed a burst release of PHMB during the first hour following PBS immersion (50.5-95.9% of total released), followed by a gradual release over 120 h (<= 25 wt % PHMB). The membranes were hydrophilic (83.7-53.3 degrees), gradually gaining hydrophobicity as PHMB was released. They displayed superior antimicrobial activity, which extended past the initial release period, retained PU hyperelasticity regardless of PHMB concentration (collective tensile modulus of 5-35% PHMB:PU membranes, 3.56 +/- 0.97 MPa; ultimate strain, >200%) and displayed minimal human cell toxicity (<25 wt % PHMB). With further development, PHMB:PU electrospun membranes may provide improved wound dressings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据