4.7 Article

TiO2-Doped Electrospun Nanofibrous Membrane for Photocatalytic Water Treatment

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym11050747

关键词

membrane filtration; polymeric nonwoven nanofibres; needle-free electrospinning; photocatalytic activity; TiO2 nanoparticles; decontamination; chemical hazards; bacteria

资金

  1. Basque Government [KK-2017/00089, KK-2018/00099]
  2. Spanish Government (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad) [TEC2015-63838-C3-3-R]
  3. grupos de investigacion del sistema universitario vasco [IT718-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work has been focused on the one-step fabrication by electrospinning of polyamide 6 (PA6) nanofibre membranes modified with titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2), where these TiO2 nanoparticles aggregates could induce a photocatalytic activity. The main potential application of these membranes could be the purification of contaminated water. Thus, it is important to analyse the contaminant degradation capability since in these membranes this is based on their photocatalytic activity. In this work, the effect of the photocatalysis has been studied both on the degradation of an organic model contaminant and on the removal of Escherichia coli and other coliform bacteria. As a result, it was observed that these membranes present excellent photocatalytic activity when they are irradiated under UV light, allowing a 70% reduction of an organic model pollutant after 240 min. In addition, these membranes successfully removed Escherichia coli and other coliform bacteria in artificially inoculated water after 24 h of contact with them. Moreover, the stand-alone structure of the membranes allowed for the reusing of the immobilized catalyst. The experimental evidence indicated that developed nanofibre membranes are a fast and efficient solution for polluted water decontamination based on photocatalysis. Their use could contribute to guarantee a fresh water level and quality, mitigating the water scarcity problem worldwide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据