4.3 Article

Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program

期刊

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 2253-2265

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1534/g3.118.200917

关键词

Genomic selection; RR-BLUP; Seed composition; Seed yield; Soybean; Genomic Prediction; GenPred; Shared Data Resources

资金

  1. United Soybean Board
  2. Georgia Agricultural Community Commission for Soybeans
  3. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences at the University of Georgia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genomic selection (GS) has become viable for selection of quantitative traits for which marker-assisted selection has often proven less effective. The potential of GS for soybean was characterized using 483 elite breeding lines, genotyped with BARCSoySNP6K iSelect BeadChips. Cross validation was performed using RR-BLUP and predictive abilities (r(MP)) of 0.81, 0.71, and 0.26 for protein, oil, and yield, were achieved at the largest tested training set size. Minimal differences were observed when comparing different marker densities and there appeared to be inflation in r(MP) due to population structure. For comparison purposes, two additional methods to predict breeding values for lines of four bi-parental populations within the GS dataset were tested. The first method predicted within each bi-parental population (WP method) and utilized a training set of full-sibs of the validation set. The second method utilized a training set of all remaining breeding lines except for full-sibs of the validation set to predict across populations (AP method). The AP method is more practical as the WP method would likely delay the breeding cycle and leverage smaller training sets. Averaging across populations for protein and oil content, r(MP) for the AP method (0.55, 0.30) approached r(MP) for the WP method (0.60, 0.52). Though comparable, r(MP) for yield was low for both AP and WP methods (0.12, 0.13). Based on increases in r(MP) as training sets increased and the effectiveness of WP vs. AP method, the AP method could potentially improve with larger training sets and increased relatedness between training and validation sets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据