4.7 Article

Short-term growth and morphological responses to nitrogen availability and plant density in hybrid poplars and willows

期刊

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 88-97

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.06.003

关键词

Hybrid poplars; Hybrid aspen; Willows; N availability; Competition; Morphological characteristics

资金

  1. Institut de Recherche sur les Forets
  2. Universite du Quebec en Abitibi-Temiscamingue
  3. Jardin botanique de Montreal
  4. Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc
  5. Canadian Wood Fibre Centre
  6. Laurentian Forestry Centre
  7. Program of Energy Research and Development (PERD) of Natural Resources Canada
  8. PERD [I11.009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Morphological characteristics of poplar and willow clones were determined in order to identify main characteristics leading to superior growth under increased plant competition with low or high nitrogen (N) availability. Seven hybrid poplar (Populus spp. including one hybrid aspen) and five willow (Salix spp.) clones were grown under greenhouse conditions for 13 weeks at three spacings (20 x 20, 35 x 35, and 60 x 60 cm) and two N levels (20 and 200 mg kg(-1)). The decrease in spacing from 60 to 20 cm reduced leaf area by 50% but clones had similar aboveground biomass per tree under all spacings, with increasing their height per unit leaf area. More productive clones had greater leaf area (+102%), leaf area per unit plant biomass (+12%) and lower root-to-shoot ratios (-27%) compared to less productive clones. There were positive relationships between leaf area and above-ground biomass per tree for both more and less productive clones. Compared to low N level and 60 cm spacing, trees growing in high N level and 20 cm spacing reached similar root collar diameter, crown width, and leaf area values and even greater height, suggesting that an addition of N could help mitigate negative effects of tree competition. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据