4.6 Review

Learning from nature: Understanding hydrogenase enzyme using computational approach

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1422

关键词

[NiFe] hydrogenase; bioinspired catalysts; DFT calculation; hydrogen evolution reaction

资金

  1. Engineering Research Center of None-food Biomass Efficient Pyrolysis and Utilization Technology of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes [2016GCZX009]
  2. Guangdong Innovation Research Team for Higher Education [2017KCXTD030]
  3. Highlevel Talents Project of Dongguan University of Technology [KCYKYQD2017017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Learning from nature is a strategy for catalyst development. Its philosophy is that creative designs of high performance catalysts can be obtained from advanced understanding of catalysts selected by nature after billions of years of evolution, such as enzyme. A typical demonstration of such strategy is the developing of catalysts for large-scale hydrogen production. Hydrogenases due to their impressive performance in catalyzing hydrogen oxidation/production, have been selected as a prototype for human being's learning to achieve better design. Fully understand the structures of hydrogenases and their catalysis mechanisms are essential to reproduce and even outperform this prototype. This article reviews the computational efforts in recent years, focusing on density functional theory calculations on [NiFe] hydrogenases. It summarizes the current knowledge regarding the identification of active sites in [NiFe] hydrogenases and reaction cycles of hydrogen oxidation, followed with a brief collection and discussion of bio-inspired molecular catalysts derived from [NiFe] hydrogenase model. The capacity of computational calculations for the clarification of catalyst geometries and reaction mechanisms has been highlighted. This article is categorized under: Structure and Mechanism > Computational Biochemistry and Biophysics Structure and Mechanism > Computational Materials Science Structure and Mechanism > Reaction Mechanisms and Catalysis

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据