4.7 Article

Habitual Breakfast Patterns Do Not Influence Appetite and Satiety Responses in Normal vs. High-Protein Breakfasts in Overweight Adolescent Girls

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu11061223

关键词

breakfast; protein; habitual breakfast patterns; fullness; intake

资金

  1. Beef Checkoff
  2. Egg Nutrition Center/American Egg Board

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differences in postprandial insulin, glucose, and/or free fatty acid concentrations, following the consumption of breakfast, have been demonstrated to be dependent on habitual breakfast patterns. This study examined the effects of habitual breakfast patterns on postprandial appetite, satiety, and hormonal responses along with daily food intake following the consumption of normal-protein (NP) vs. higher-protein (HP) breakfasts in overweight adolescents. Thirty-seven girls (age: 19 +/- 1 year; BMI: 29.0 +/- 3.4 kg/m(2)) participated in the semi-randomized crossover design study. Participants were grouped according to whether they habitually skipped (SKIP, n = 18) or consumed breakfast (CONSUME, n = 19), and consumed a NP (350 kcal; 13 g protein) or HP (350 kcal; 35 g protein) breakfast for 3 days/pattern. On day 4, breakfast was provided, and appetite questionnaires and blood samples were collected throughout an 8 h testing day. Daily food intake was also assessed. Regardless of habitual breakfast patterns, the consumption of HP breakfast led to greater daily fullness (29,030 +/- 6,010 min x mm) vs. NP breakfast (26,910 +/- 5580 min x mm; p = 0.03). Daily protein consumption was greater (98 +/- 15 g vs. 78 +/- 15 g), and carbohydrate consumption was lower (331 +/- 98 g vs. 367 +/- 94 g) with HP vs. NP (both, p < 0.001). No other differences were observed. These data suggest that the recommendation to consume a HP breakfast for improved satiety and ingestive behavior is appropriate for overweight adolescent girls, regardless of habitual breakfast patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据