4.6 Article

Effect of Compositional and Processing Variations in New 5182-Type AlMgMn Alloys on Mechanical Properties and Deformation Surface Quality

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma12101645

关键词

aluminium alloys; AlMgMn alloys; Luders elongation; stretcher strain marks; quenching; particles

资金

  1. Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) [861866]
  2. Christian Doppler Research Association
  3. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs
  4. National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laboratory-scale sheets of 5182-type AlMgMn alloys with varying Mg and Mn contents and additions of different amounts of Zn, Cu, Zr and Er were studied. The sheets were produced using two different cold-rolling degrees and two soft-annealing treatment procedures: air-circulated furnace annealing at 370 degrees C with subsequent furnace cooling, and salt-bath annealing with subsequent water quenching. Mechanical properties and deformation surface quality were studied via tensile tests with simultaneous visual surface characterization. The influence of the chemical composition and the processing route on grain size, mechanical properties, and surface quality is discussed in the study. A reduction in the Mg content improves the surface quality after plastic deformation, but at the expense of the mechanical properties. The results suggest the presence of an optimum Mn content in terms of optical appearance and mechanical properties. Adding Zr largely inhibits recrystallization, which is reflected in a textured microstructure. Adding Er affects neither the surface quality nor the mechanical properties. Specific combinations of Zn or Cu addition, cold-rolling degree, and heat treatment generate significant improvements in the mechanical and optical properties. In general, annealing at high temperature with subsequent quenching leads to enhanced surface quality and mechanical properties, and adding Zn enables further noteworthy improvements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据