4.6 Article

Controlling the Composition and Magnetic Properties of Nano-SrFe12O19 Powder Synthesized from Oily Cold Mill Sludge by the Citrate Precursor Method

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma12081250

关键词

SrFe12O19; nanoparticles; citrate precursor method; industrial waste; magnetic properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51502014, 51672024]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-TP-17-1812]
  3. program of China Scholarships Council [201806465040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new method for producing nano-SrFe12O19 powder by the citrate precursor route using solid waste as a source of iron. This solid iron-containing waste, which exists in the form of an oily sludge, is produced by a cold rolling mill. This sludge was first subjected to a process, including sulfuric acid leaching, oxidation, precipitation, and nitric acid leaching, to obtain an iron nitrate (Fe(NO3)(3)) solution. Next, the Fe(NO3)(3) solution was mixed with a strontium nitrate (Sr(NO3)(2)) solution obtained by subjecting strontium carbonate to nitric acid leaching. Subsequently, citric acid, as chelating agent, and ammonia water, as precipitating agent, were added to the mixed solution to form a gel. The gel was dried and spontaneously combusted, then annealed at different temperatures for 2 h in flowing air. The effects of the Fe3+/Sr2+ molar ratio and annealing temperature on the formation, morphology, and magnetic properties of SrFe12O19 were investigated. The results showed that single-phase SrFe12O19 powder was obtained by decreasing the Fe3+/Sr2+ molar ratio from the stoichiometric value of 12 to 11.6 and increasing the annealing temperature to 1000 degrees C for 2 h. Adjustment of the Fe/Sr molar ratio to 12 and the annealing temperature to 900 degrees C enabled the magnetic properties to be optimized, including saturation magnetization (Ms) 80.2 emu/g, remanence magnetization (Mr) 39.8 emu/g, and coercive force (Hc) 6318 Oe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据