4.4 Article

Distribution of soil aggregates and organic carbon in deep soil under long-term conservation tillage with residual retention in dryland

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID LAND
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 241-254

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40333-019-0094-6

关键词

long-term tillage; residue retention; soil aggregates; SOC; deep soil; dryland

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD0200408, 2016YFD0300804]
  2. Science and Technology Project [2015BAD22B03]
  3. Basic Scientific Research Business Expenses of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences [1610132018024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To ascertain the effects of long-term conservation tillage and residue retention on soil organic carbon (SOC) content and aggregate distribution in a deep soil (>20-cm depth) in a dryland environment, this paper analyzed the SOC and aggregate distribution in soil, and the aggregate-associated organic carbon (OC) and SOC physical fractions. Conservation tillage (reduced tillage with residue incorporated (RT) and no-tillage with residue mulch (NT)) significantly increased SOC sequestration and soil aggregation in deep soil compared with conventional tillage with residue removal (CT). Compared with CT, RT significantly increased the proportion of small macroaggregates by 23%-81% in the 10-80 cm layer, and the OC content in small macroaggregates by 1%-58% in the 0-80 cm layer. RT significantly increased (by 24%-90%) the OC content in mineral-SOC within small macroaggregates in the 0-60 cm layer, while there was a 23%-80% increase in the 0-40 cm layer with NT. These results indicated that: (1) conservation tillage treatments are beneficial for soil aggregation and SOC sequestration in a deep soil in a dryland environment; and (2) the SOC in mineral-associated OC plays important roles in soil aggregation and SOC sequestration. In conclusion, RT with NT is recommended as an agricultural management tool in dryland soils because of its role in improving soil aggregation and SOC sequestration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据