4.7 Article

Cytokine-Regulated Phosphorylation and Activation of TET2 by JAK2 in Hematopoiesis

期刊

CANCER DISCOVERY
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 778-795

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1138

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI F99/K00 award [CA223044]
  2. MSKCC Support Grant/Core Grant [P30 CA008748]
  3. Evans Foundation
  4. Harith Foundation
  5. Suhith Wickrema Memorial Fund
  6. Leinbach Family Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Even though the Ten-eleven translocation (TET) enzymes catalyze the generation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosines required for lineage commitment and subsequent differentiation of stem cells into erythroid cells, the mechanisms that link extracellular signals to TET activation and DNA hydroxymethylation are unknown. We demonstrate that hematopoietic cytokines phosphorylate TET2, leading to its activation in erythroid progenitors. Specifically, cytokine receptor-associated JAK2 phosphorylates TET2 at tyrosines 1939 and 1964. Phosphorylated TET2 interacts with the erythroid transcription factor KLF1, and this interaction with TET2 is increased upon exposure to erythropoietin. The activating JAK2(V617F) mutation seen in myeloproliferative disease patient samples and in mouse models is associated with increased TET activity and cytosine hydroxymethylation as well as genome-wide loss of cytosine methylation. These epigenetic and functional changes are also associated with increased expression of several oncogenic transcripts. Thus, we demonstrate that JAK2-mediated TET2 phosphorylation provides a mechanistic link between extracellular signals and epigenetic changes during hematopoiesis. SIGNIFICANCE: Identification of TET2 phosphorylation and activation by cytokine-stimulated JAK2 links extracellular signals to chromatin remodeling during hematopoietic differentiation. This provides potential avenues to regulate TET2 function in the context of myeloproliferative disorders and myelo-dysplastic syndromes associated with the JAK2(V617F)-activating mutation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据