4.8 Article

Multidimensional Ordered Bifunctional Air Electrode Enables Flash Reactants Shuttling for High-Energy Flexible Zn-Air Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201900911

关键词

flash reactants shuttling; multidimensional ordered architecture; self-supported electrodes; Zn-air batteries

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. University of Waterloo
  3. Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology
  4. NSERC
  5. National Research Council Canada
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  7. Province of Saskatchewan
  8. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  9. University of Saskatchewan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct growth of electrocatalysts on conductive substrates is an emerging strategy to prepare air electrodes for flexible Zn-air batteries (FZABs). However, electrocatalysts grown on conductive substrates usually suffer from disorder and are densely packed with prohibited zones, in which internal blockages shut off the active sites from catalyzing the oxygen reaction. Herein, to minimize the prohibited zones, an ordered multidimensional array assembled by 1D carbon nanotubes and 2D carbon nanoridges decorated with 0D cobalt nanoparticles (referred as MPZ-CC@CNT) is constructed on nickel foam. When the MPZ-CC@CNT is directly applied as a self-supported electrode for FZAB, it delivers a marginal voltage fading rate of 0.006 mV cycle(-1) over 1800 cycles (600 h) at a current density of 50 mA cm(-2) and an impressive energy density of 946 Wh kg(-1). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy reveals that minimal internal resistance and electrochemical polarization, which is beneficial for the flash reactant shuttling among the triphase (i.e., oxygen, electrolyte, and catalyst) are offered by the open and ordered architecture. This advanced electrode design provides great potential to boost the electrochemical performance of other rechargeable battery systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据