4.7 Article

Association of Novel Nonsynonymous Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in ampD with Cephalosporin Resistance and Phylogenetic Variations in ampC, ampR, ompF, and ompC in Enterobacter cloacae Isolates That Are Highly Resistant to Carbapenems

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 60, 期 4, 页码 2383-2390

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02835-15

关键词

-

资金

  1. Margarete und Walter Lichtenstein Stiftung Universitatsspital Basel, Switzerland
  2. Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft Basel, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Enterobacter cloacae, the genetic lesions associated with derepression of the AmpC beta-lactamase include diverse single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and/or indels in the ampD and ampR genes and SNPs in ampC, while diverse SNPs in the promoter region or SNPs/indels within the coding sequence of outer membrane proteins have been described to alter porin production leading to carbapenem resistance. We sought to define the underlying mechanisms conferring cephalosporin and carbapenem resistance in a collection of E. cloacae isolates with unusually high carbapenem resistance and no known carbapenemase and, in contrast to many previous studies, considered the SNPs we detected in relation to the multilocus sequence type (MLST)-based phylogeny of our collection. Whole-genome sequencing was applied on the most resistant isolates to seek novel carbapenemases, expression of ampC was measured by reverse transcriptase PCR, and porin translation was detected by SDS-PAGE. SNPs occurring in ampC, ampR, ompF, and ompC genes (and their promoter regions) were mostly phylogenetic variations, relating to the isolates' sequence types, whereas nonsynonymous SNPs in ampD were associated with derepression of AmpC and cephalosporin resistance. The additional loss of porins resulted in high-level carbapenem resistance, underlining the clinical importance of chromosomal mutations among carbapenem-resistant E. cloacae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据