4.8 Article

A defined mechanistic correlate of protection against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in non-human primates

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09894-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. University Challenge Seed Fund (Oxford University Innovation)
  2. Wellcome Trust [201477/Z/16/Z, 106917/Z/15/Z, 206194]
  3. United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
  4. Intramural Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  5. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) iCASE PhD Studentship [MR/K017632/1]
  6. Wellcome Trust [201477/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [ZIAAI001020] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malaria vaccine design and prioritization has been hindered by the lack of a mechanistic correlate of protection. We previously demonstrated a strong association between protection and merozoite-neutralizing antibody responses following vaccination of non-human primates against Plasmodium falciparum reticulocyte binding protein homolog 5 (PfRH5). Here, we test the mechanism of protection. Using mutant human IgG1 Fc regions engineered not to engage complement or FcR-dependent effector mechanisms, we produce merozoite-neutralizing and non-neutralizing anti-PfRH5 chimeric monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and perform a passive transfer-P. falciparum challenge study in Aotus nancymaae monkeys. At the highest dose tested, 6/6 animals given the neutralizing PfRH5-binding mAb c2AC7 survive the challenge without treatment, compared to 0/6 animals given non-neutralizing PfRH5-binding mAb c4BA7 and 0/6 animals given an isotype control mAb. Our results address the controversy regarding whether merozoite-neutralizing antibody can cause protection against P. falciparum blood-stage infections, and highlight the quantitative challenge of achieving such protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据