4.6 Article

Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Prevent Neurological Complications of Radiotherapy

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00204

关键词

radiotherapy; stem cells; cognition; neuroprotection; intranasal cell delivery; CREB; neurocognitive sequelae; brain cancer

资金

  1. non-profit foundation Fundacion Progreso y Salud of the Andalusian Regional Ministry of Health [PI-0109-2014, PI-0272-2017]
  2. Fondos FEDER [RD16/0011/0034, PI17/02104, PI18/01590, PI15/00134, PI16/00259]
  3. crowdfunding platform PRECIPITA of the Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology [2018-000237]
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CP14/00105, CD16/00118]
  5. Fondos FEDER
  6. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, Instituto de Salud Carlos III

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiotherapy is a highly effective tool for the treatment of brain cancer. However, radiation also causes detrimental effects in the healthy tissue, leading to neurocognitive sequelae that compromise the quality of life of brain cancer patients. Despite the recognition of this serious complication, no satisfactory solutions exist at present. Here we investigated the effects of intranasal administration of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) as a neuroprotective strategy for cranial radiation in mice. Our results demonstrated that intranasally delivered hMSCs promote radiation-induced brain injury repair, improving neurological function. This intervention confers protection against inflammation, oxidative stress, and neuronal loss. hMSC administration reduces persistent activation of damage-induced c-AMP response element-binding signaling in irradiated brains. Furthermore, hMSC treatment did not compromise the survival of glioma-bearing mice. Our findings encourage the therapeutic use of hMSCs as a non-invasive approach to prevent neurological complications of radiotherapy, improving the quality of life of brain tumor patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据