4.2 Article

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain Using Compressed Sensing - Quality Assessment in Daily Clinical Routine

期刊

CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 279-286

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00062-019-00789-x

关键词

Compressed sensing; Clinical quality assessment; Accelerated imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Parallel imaging

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [637164] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  2. H2020 European Research Council [637164] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To assess the effect of compressed sensing (CS) on image quality and acquisition speed in routine brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods During a 2-month implementation period of CS, two senior neuroradiologists, one MRI physicist and one application specialist optimized the CS acceleration factor to reduce scan time and improve spatial resolution, while maintaining image quality. Afterwards, two neuroradiologists independently scored image quality on a 5-point Likert scale in 3-dimensional (3D) fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR), 3D double inversion recovery (DIR), 3D T2, 3D T1, 3D T1 + gadoteric acid, axial T2, axial FLAIR, axial T2*, and 3D arterial time-of-flight MR angiography (art. TOF) sequences acquired during 1 week before (CS-) and after (CS+) the implementation of CS. Time of acquisition was recorded for all sequences. Results A total of 51 CS- and 48 CS+ patients were included. The median scan time reduction was 29.3% (range 0.0-58.4%), median voxel size reduction was 10.5% (0.0-33.3%). The CS+ image quality was rated superior for 3D FLAIR (p < 0.001), 3D T2 (p = 0.001), and axial T2* sequences (p = 0.024). For all other sequences, no statistical difference in image quality was observed. Interreader agreement regarding image quality was good for all sequences (weighted Cohen's kappa > 0.5). Conclusion The use of CS saves considerable imaging time while allowing to increase spatial resolution in routine clinical brain MRI without loss in image quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据