4.2 Article

Bone microstructure of the pareiasaur Provelosaurus americanus from the Middle Permian of southern Brazil

期刊

HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 328-339

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2019.1617288

关键词

Parareptilia; Pareiasauria; osteohistology; life history; growth record; dermal armor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examined the microstructure of Provelosaurus americanus, a pareiasaur from Brazil, revealing slow cyclical growth with irregular spacing between growth marks. The specimen did not reach skeletal maturity and lived at least fifteen years. Osteoderms showed a trilaminar structure with intramembraneous ossification.
Provelosaurus americanus from the Guadalupian of Brazil, is the only species of pareiasaur known from South America and its studies are limited to anatomical descriptions. Here, we examined the microstructure of limb bones, a rib fragment and osteoderms of P. americanus, aiming to answer questions related to its paleobiology. The bone tissues of this specimen comprise poorly vascularised parallel-fibred bone interrupted by growth marks indicating slow, cyclical growth. This is consistent with the pattern found in other pareisaurs from South Africa. However, the space between the LAGs are irregular and there is no clear decreasing in vascularity toward the periphery of the bone, suggesting that it did not reach skeletal maturity. The highest number of LAGs was found in the rib, suggesting that our sample lived a minimum of fifteen years. The osteoderms present a trilaminar structure consisting of a diploe composed of a cancellous core surrounded by two cortical layers. A diploe is absent from the osteoderms of previously studied South African pareiasaurs. The osteogenesis of the osteoderms is intramembraneous, but a metaplastic ossification during the early developmental stage cannot be entirely discarded, due to extensive remodeling in the central core that could have destroyed potential metaplastic tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据