4.2 Article

Global Precipitation Forecasts by Merging Extrapolation-Based Nowcast and Numerical Weather Prediction with Locally Optimized Weights

期刊

WEATHER AND FORECASTING
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 701-714

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-18-0164.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Precipitation Measuring Mission (PMM)
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [JP15K18128, JP18H01549, JP16K17807]
  3. [ra000015]
  4. [ra001011]
  5. [hp160162]
  6. [hp160229]
  7. [hp170246]
  8. [hp170305]
  9. [hp180194]
  10. [hp180062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past few decades, precipitation forecasts by numerical weather prediction (NWP) models have been remarkably improved. Yet, precipitation nowcasting based on spatiotemporal extrapolation tends to provide a better precipitation forecast at shorter lead times with much less computation. Therefore, merging the precipitation forecasts from the NWP and extrapolation systems would be a viable approach to quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF). Although the optimal weights between the NWP and extrapolation systems are usually defined as a global constant, the weights would vary in space, particularly for global QPF. This study proposes a method to find the optimal weights at each location using the local threat score (LTS), a spatially localized version of the threat score. We test the locally optimal weighting with a global NWP system composed of the local ensemble transform Kalman filter and the Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM-LETKF). For the extrapolation system, the RIKEN's global precipitation nowcasting system called GSMaP_RNC is used. GSMaP_RNC extrapolates precipitation patterns from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)'s Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP). The benefit of merging in global precipitation forecast lasts longer compared to regional precipitation forecast. The results show that the locally optimal weighting is beneficial.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据