4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Assessment of non-Hertzian wheel-rail contact models for numerical simulation of rail damages in switch panel of railway turnout

期刊

WEAR
卷 432, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2019.05.027

关键词

Railway turnout; Wear; Surface initiated RCF; Non-Hertzian; Rolling contact; Numerical simulation

资金

  1. Science and Technology Research Project of the Jiangxi Provincial Education Department [GJJ180338]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB1102600]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51608459, 51778542, U1734207]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2682018CX01]
  5. Key Research and Development Projects of Science and Technology Program for Sichuan Province [2019YFG0283]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rail damages in railway turnout switch panels are closely related to the complicated wheel-rail contact conditions in the turnouts. In order to assess the applicability of different non-Hertzian contact models for simulating rail damages in railway turnout switch panel, three engineering approaches, i.e. Kik-Piotrowski, Ayasse-Chollet and Sichani, are adopted to simulate rail wear and surface initiated rolling contact fatigue (RCF) damages by studying a Chinese CN60-1100-1:18 high-speed turnout switch panel. A comparison is then carried out taking into account the results calculated by Kalker's three-dimensional (3D) theory and an elastic-plastic FEM (Finite Element Method) model. The analyzed results show that the computational efficiencies of the three engineering approaches are all quite high for simulating rail damages in switch panel. Under elastic conditions, the calculation accuracy of the Sichani approach is found to be the highest, meaning that this would appear to be the preferred method for simulating rail damages in railway turnout switch panel. The research findings can be taken as theoretical guidance for selecting wheel-rail contact models and analyzing these types of damages in railway turnout switch panels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据