4.7 Article

Recycling of waste autoclaved aerated concrete powder in Portland cement by accelerated carbonation

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 254-264

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.018

关键词

Waste autoclaved aerated concrete; Portland cement; Carbonation curing; Compressive strength; Chloride ion penetration; Microstructure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778188]
  2. Practical Technology Research and Development Program of Heilongjiang Province-China [GA16C103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To recycle waste autoclaved aerated concrete (WAAC) and minimize environmental pollution induced by Portland cement (PC), carbonation curing was performed on cement pastes containing variable replacement levels (0-50%) of waste autoclaved aerated concrete powder. Compressive strength and chloride ion permeability of PC-WAAC specimens were measured and related mechanisms were demonstrated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Si-29 solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), thermogravimetry-differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), mercury intrusion porosimeter (MIP), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and back scattered electron images (BSE) measurements. Results showed that the PC-WAAC specimens presents a higher compressive strength increase than the pure PC specimen after carbonation curing and the optimal dosage of WAAC is 20%. This effect compensates the decreasing strength induced by the incorporation of WAAC. Chloride ion penetration resistance of cement pastes were also improved by carbonation curing due to the refinement of pore structure. Up to 20% of WAAC can be successfully recycled to replace PC without compromising strength and chloride ion permeability. Moreover, around 11.23-19.02% of CO2 by the total binder weight can be captured. Therefore, this technology has a great environmental potential to both recycling of construction waste and capture of greenhouse gas. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据