4.7 Article

Optimizing the extraction process of natural antioxidants from chardonnay grape marc using microwave-assisted extraction

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 110-117

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.031

关键词

Grape marc; Valorisation; Microwave-assisted technology; Efficient extraction; Phenolic compounds; Antioxidant capacity

资金

  1. University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU [PPG17/18]
  2. Basque Government (Department of Quality and Food Industry)
  3. Provincial Council of Gipuzkoa (Department of Economic Development, the Rural Environment and Territorial Balance)
  4. Euskara Errektoreordetza (UPV/EHU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work was to extract phenolic compounds from Chardonnay grape mart employing a microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). Firstly, the effect of solvent concentration (30-60%), solid mass (1.0-2.0 g) and extraction time (5-15 min) on the recovery of phenolic content and antioxidant capacity was evaluated using a response surface methodology (RSM). The optimal parameters found by RSM were 48% ethanol for the solvent content, 10 min for the extraction time, and 1.77 g for the solid mass. The extraction was carried out at room temperature to increase scaling-up opportunities at industrial level. It was found that the phenolic profile was mainly composed of flavanols, such as procyanidins, catechin and epicatechin. Furthermore, the polyphenols obtained by MAE showed a DPPH center dot inhibition value of 87 +/- 5% and the total phenolic content was 1.21 +/- 0.04 mg GAE/mL. Finally, it was observed that the degradation temperature of the extract ( approximate to 200 degrees C) was above the temperature commonly used for the manufacture of protein films by thermo-mechanical processes. This highlights the potential use of this extract as a bioactive additive in protein film forming formulations for food and pharmaceutical applications. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据