4.3 Article

Detecting students-at-risk in computer programming classes with learning analytics from students' digital footprints

期刊

USER MODELING AND USER-ADAPTED INTERACTION
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 759-788

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11257-019-09234-7

关键词

Computer Science Education; Learning analytics; Predictive modelling; Machine learning; Peer learning; Educational data mining

资金

  1. Irish Research Council
  2. National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning in Ireland [GOIPG/2015/3497]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland [12/RC/2289]
  4. Fulbright Ireland
  5. Irish Research Council (IRC) [GOIPG/2015/3497] Funding Source: Irish Research Council (IRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different sources of data about students, ranging from static demographics to dynamic behavior logs, can be harnessed from a variety sources at Higher Education Institutions. Combining these assembles a rich digital footprint for students, which can enable institutions to better understand student behaviour and to better prepare for guiding students towards reaching their academic potential. This paper presents a newresearch methodology to automatically detect students at-risk of failing an assignment in computer programming modules (courses) and to simultaneously support adaptive feedback. By leveraging historical student data, we built predictive models using students' offline (static) information including student characteristics and demographics, and online (dynamic) resources using programming and behaviour activity logs. Predictions are generated weekly during semester. Overall, the predictive and personalised feedback helped to reduce the gap between the lower and higher-performing students. Furthermore, students praised the prediction and the personalised feedback, conveying strong recommendations for future students to use the system. We also found that students who followed their personalised guidance and recommendations performed better in examinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据