4.7 Article

Ultrasensitive analysis of kanamycin residue in milk by SERS-based aptasensor

期刊

TALANTA
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 151-158

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.01.015

关键词

Kanamycin; Aptamer; Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy; Milk

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1603404]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018MS056, 2017MS075]
  3. International and Hong Kong Macau Taiwan Collaborative Innovation Platform of Guangdong Province on Intelligent Food Quality Control and Process Technology Equipment [2015KGJHZ001]
  4. Guangdong Provincial R&D Centre for the Modern Agricultural Industry on Non-destructive Detection and Intensive Processing of Agricultural Products
  5. Common Technical Innovation Team of Guangdong Province on Preservation and Logistics of Agricultural Products [2016LM2154]
  6. Innovation Centre of Guangdong Province for Modern Agricultural Science and Technology on Intelligent Sensing and Precision Control of Agricultural Product Qualities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ultrasensitive method for the kanamycin (KANA) detection in milk sample using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy-based aptasensor was employed in the current study. Double strand DNA binding bimetallic gold@ silver nanoparticles were developed as a sensing platform. Probe DNAs were first embedded on the surface of gold nanoparticles by the end-modified thiol, and after silver shell encapsulating, KANA aptamer DNAs with the Raman reporter Cy3 were then hybridized with probe DNAs by complementary base pairing. Results showed that with increase in the KANA concentration, the Raman intensity of Cy3 decreased. Besides achieving selectivity, an ultralow detection limit of 0.90 pg/mL, a broad linear relationship ranging from 10 mu g/mL to 100 ng/mL in aqueous reagent and satisfactory recoveries of 90.4-112% in liquid whole milk were obtained. The result of actual sample proved that this aptasensor was promising in trace determination of KANA residue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据