4.7 Article

A novel electrochemical chiral interface based on the synergistic effect of polysaccharides for the recognition of tyrosine enantiomers

期刊

TALANTA
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 628-637

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.11.107

关键词

Chiral electrochemical sensor; Polysaccharide; Soluble starch; Chitosan; Tyrosine enantiomers; Square wave voltammetry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674292, 21471163]
  2. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Hunan [2016JJ1023]
  3. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project, China [2018TP1003]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2018zzts361]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical chiral interface based on two polysaccharides, soluble starch (SS) and chitosan (CS), was fabricated and used for chiral recognition of tyrosine (Tyr) enantiomers via square wave voltammetry (SWV). The SS-CS composite was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. Under the optimized experimental conditions, the oxidation peak current ratio of L-Tyr to D-Tyr (I-L/I-D) and the difference between the peak potential (Delta Ep = E-D - E-L) were observed to be 1.38 and 12 mV at the SS-CS/GCE. In addition, a good linear relationship between Tyr enantiomer concentration and peak current could be observed. The SS-CS/GCE exhibited good coefficients of determination (R-D-Tyr(2) = 0.99631 and R-L-Tyr(2) = 0.98333) for D-Tyr and L-Tyr in the concentration range 0.01-1.00 mM. The novel SS-CS/GCE showed an ability to predict the ratios of L- and D-Tyr in a racemic mixture and exhibited the possibility of qualitative and quantitative determination of Tyr enantiomers. The proposed SS-CS/GCE-based chiral sensor exhibited high anti-interference ability in the presence of 10-fold higher concentrations of physiological substances and various metal compounds. Meanwhile, the SS-CS/GCE possessed good repeatability and excellent reproducibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据