4.6 Article

Preoperative biliary drainage of the hepatic lobe to be resected does not affect liver hypertrophy after percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06813-y

关键词

Cholangiocarcinoma; Gallbladder carcinoma; Obstructive jaundice; Hepatectomy; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and biliary drainage

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In patients with malignant perihilar biliary strictures, preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) of the hepatic lobe to be resected may decrease the liver volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) after percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization (PVE). However, evidence of its application is insufficient. This study aimed to clarify the effects of PBD on liver hypertrophy after PVE. Methods Between January 2008 and December 2017, 169 patients with malignant perihilar biliary strictures underwent major hepatectomy or palliative surgery at our hospital. Of these, 76 patients who underwent PVE were categorized into two groups: group A (n = 29) who received unilateral PBD of the FLR and group B (n = 47) who received bilateral PBD, including that of the hepatic lobe to be resected. FLR ratios after PVE and liver hypertrophy ratios were retrospectively compared in both groups. Results Group B exhibited significantly severe biliary stenosis (p = 0.0038) and high serum bilirubin before biliary drainage (p = 0.0037). After PVE, the total liver volumes were 1287 +/- 260 ml and 1340 +/- 257 ml (p = 0.39), respectively. FLR volumes were 555 +/- 135 and 577 +/- 113 ml (p = 0.45), respectively. FLR ratios were 43.4 +/- 8.2% and 43.4 +/- 6.4%, respectively (p = 0.98). Liver hypertrophy ratios were 124.2 +/- 17.7% and 129.2 +/- 20.9%, respectively (p = 0.28). In addition, an examination which excluded patients with Bismuth type I obtained similar result. Conclusions PBD of the hepatic lobe to be resected did not decrease the FLR ratios and hypertrophy ratios. Thus, in patients with poor biliary drainage, additional PBD of the target lobe is acceptable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据