4.0 Article

A revised geochronology of Thurston Island, West Antarctica, and correlations along the proto-Pacific margin of Gondwana

期刊

ANTARCTIC SCIENCE
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 47-60

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954102016000341

关键词

granite; Hf isotopes; Marie Byrd Land; volcanic; zircon

资金

  1. Natural Environmental Research Council
  2. NERC [nigl010001, bas0100029] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [nigl010001, bas0100029] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The continental margin of Gondwana preserves a record of long-lived magmatism from the Andean Cordillera to Australia. The crustal blocks of West Antarctica form part of this margin, with Palaeozoic-Mesozoic magmatism particularly well preserved in the Antarctic Peninsula and Marie Byrd Land. Magmatic events on the intervening Thurston Island crustal block are poorly defined, which has hindered accurate correlations along the margin. Six samples are dated here using U-Pb geochronology and cover the geological history on Thurston Island. The basement gneisses from Morgan Inlet have a protolith age of 349 +/- 2Ma and correlate closely with the Devonian-Carboniferous magmatism of Marie Byrd Land and New Zealand. Triassic (240-220 Ma) magmatism is identified at two sites on Thurston Island, with Hf isotopes indicating magma extraction from Mesoproterozoic-age lower crust. Several sites on Thurston Island preserve rhyolitic tuffs that have been dated at 182 Ma and are likely to correlate with the successions in the Antarctic Peninsula, particularly given the pre-break-up position of the Thurston Island crustal block. Silicic volcanism was widespread in Patagonia and the Antarctic Peninsula at similar to 183Ma forming the extensive Chon Aike Province. The most extensive episode of magmatism along the active margin took place during the mid-Cretaceous. This Cordillera ' flare-up ' event of the Gondwana margin is also developed on Thurston Island with granitoid magmatism dated in the interval 110-100Ma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据