4.7 Article

Vortex assisted-ionic liquid dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and spectrophotometric determination of quercetin in tea, honey, fruit juice and wine samples after optimization based on response surface methodology

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117166

关键词

Microextraction; Quercetin; Central composite design; Response surface methodology; Foods; Spectrophotometly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of our study is to develop a new vortex assisted-ionic liquid dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (VA-IL-DLLM ) method for preconcentration and determination of the quercetin in tea, honey, fruit juice and wine samples by spectrophotometry. The method is based on pH sensitive ion-pair formation between quercetin and rhodamine B at pH 6.5 by donor-acceptor mechanism, and then dispersion of the complex in the linedrops of ionic liquid (IL). In this context, the effects of pH, concentrations of ion-pairing reagent, the IL, vortex time and dispersive solvent type on the preconcentration process of quercetin were investigated using a 2-level-5-factor central composite half fraction design (CCD) as experimental design for response surface methodology (RSM). Quantitative model was developed to determine the quercetin in food samples, and it is verified by analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 95% confidence level (P < 0.05). Response surface plots and contour plots obtained by the model are used to determine the interactions of experimental variables. After the optimization, calibration graph was obtained between 35 and 750 mu g L-1 with the detection limit of 10.2 mu g L-1. The recovery and relative standard deviations (RSD%) were in range of 94-104%, and in range of 2.5-42%, respectively. The accuracy and precision of the method were tested by the experimental studies such as recoveries, intermediate precision, trueness and expanded uncertainty. A comparison of the current results to those reported for other studies is also presented. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据