4.7 Article

Pentachlorophenol alters the acetate-assimilating microbial community and redox cycling in anoxic soils

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 133-140

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.01.008

关键词

C-13-acetate; Anaerobic degradation; Chlorinated organic pollutant; DNA-SIP; Redox process

资金

  1. China-Ontario Project [2016YFE0101900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41721001, 41601248, 41771269]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acetate is a common electron donor that can drive microbial reductive processes in anaerobic environments. Apart from acting as a terminal electron acceptor, chlorinated organic pollutant of pentachlorophenol (PCP) has antimicrobial properties but little is known about its effect on anaerobic microbial populations during bioremediation. To elucidate the effect of PCP on the anaerobic microbial community, DNA-based stable isotope probing was performed using C-13-acetate as a substrate in two depths (0-20 cm and 80-100 cm) of mangrove soils. The addition of PCP had little influence on Fe(III) reduction, but dramatically inhibited the SO42- reduction, resulting in a high emission of CH4 under anoxic conditions. Correspondingly, PCP significantly affected the composition of prokaryotic C-13-labeled OTUs (Operational Taxonomic Units) at both soil depths. Members of Clostridiales (Firmicutes) and Burkholderiales (Betaproteobacteria) were dominant C-13-acetate utilizers and potential PCP degraders. The PCP addition decreased sulfate reduction process through inhibition of classical sulfate- and sulfur-reducing bacteria belonging to families of Desulfarculaceae, Desulfobulbaceae and Desulfobacteraceae. Our study showed that indigenous microbial communities associated with terminal electron-accepting pathways (e.g. Fe3+ and SO42- reduction) changed differently during PCP dechlorination. These findings suggest a great impact of chlorinated pollutants on the soil biogeochemical processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据