4.6 Article

Multi-Objective Stochastic Fractal Search: a powerful algorithm for solving complex multi-objective optimization problems

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 3037-3066

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-019-04080-6

关键词

Multi-Objective Stochastic Fractal Search; Multi-objective optimization; Metaheuristic algorithm; Multi-criteria optimization; Engineering optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stochastic Fractal Search (SFS) is a novel and powerful metaheuristic algorithm. This paper presents a Multi-Objective Stochastic Fractal Search (MOSFS) for the first time, to solve complex multi-objective optimization problems. The presented algorithm uses an external archive to collect efficient Pareto optimal solutions during the optimization process. Using dominance rules, leader selection and grid mechanisms, MOSFS precisely approximates the true Pareto optimal front. The MOSFS is implemented on nine multi-objective benchmark functions (CEC 2009) with multimodal, convex, discrete and non-convex optimal Pareto fronts. Performance of the proposed algorithm is compared to well-known algorithms. In addition, different performance measures are considered to evaluate the convergence and coverage abilities of the algorithms including Inverted Generational Distance, Maximum Spread and Spacing. Furthermore, statistical analyses are utilized to determine the superior algorithm. The results revealed that the MOSFS performs significantly better than other algorithms in both convergence and coverage and it is able to approximate true Pareto front precisely. In the end, MOSFS is implemented to solve a real-world engineering design problem called welded beam design problem and efficiency of the algorithm is compared to recently developed algorithms. The results of simulations and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test showed that the MOSFS is able to provide the most promising Pareto front for the problem considering various performance metrics at a 95% confidence level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据