4.8 Article

High-Stability MnOx Nanowires@C@MnOx Nanosheet Core-Shell Heterostructure Pseudocapacitance Electrode Based on Reversible Phase Transition Mechanism

期刊

SMALL
卷 15, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201900862

关键词

energy storage; manganese oxide; porous carbon; solid-state supercapacitors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674221, 51704261]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2018203330]
  3. Research Foundation of Yanshan University [16LGA012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A stable MnOx@C@MnOx core-shell heterostructure consisting of vertical MnOx nanosheets grown evenly on the surface of the MnOx@carbon nanowires are obtained by simple liquid phase method combined with thermal treatment. The hierarchical MnOx@C@MnOx heterostructure electrode possesses a high specific capacitance of 350 F g(-1) and an excellent cycle performance owing to the existence of the pore structure among the ultrasmall MnOx nanoparticles and the rapid transmission of electrons between the active material and carbon coating layer. Particularly, according to the in situ Raman spectra analysis, no characteristic peaks corresponding to MnOOH are found during charging/discharging, indicating that pseudocapacitive behavior of the MnOx electrode have no relevance to the intercalation/deintercalation of protons (H+) in the electrolyte. Further combining in situ X-ray powder diffraction analysis, the diffraction peak of -MnO2 can be detected in the process of charging, while Mn3O4 phase is found in discharge products. Therefore, these results demonstrate that the MnOx undergoes a reversible phase transformation reaction of Mn3O4-MnO2. Moreover, the assembled all-solid-state asymmetric supercapacitor with a MnOx@C@MnOx electrode delivers a high energy density of 23 Wh kg(-1), an acceptable power density of 2500 W kg(-1), and an excellent cyclic stability performance of 94% after 2000 cycles, showing the potential for practical application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据