4.3 Article

The effect of body position on airway patency in obstructive sleep apnea: CT imaging analysis

期刊

SLEEP AND BREATHING
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 911-916

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11325-019-01863-x

关键词

Obstructive sleep apnea; Sleep; Body position; Airway; Computed tomography

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education of the Korean government [NRF2017R1D1A1B03028964]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Positional change during sleep influences upper airway patency. However, few studies have used imaging techniques to demonstrate the change. This study aims to determine the effect of positional change on the upper airway space. Methods A total of 118 subjects with sleep breathing disorders were analyzed. Participants underwent upper airway CT scans in the supine and lateral decubitus positions (right and left). They were divided into non-obstructive sleep apnea (n = 28) and obstructive sleep apnea (n = 90) groups. We measured the minimal cross-sectional area of the retropalatal/retroglossal spaces and compared the differences of those two spaces in the supine and lateral positions. CT was performed while patients were awake. Results The minimal cross-sectional area in the OSA group was significantly smaller than non-OSA group in both supine (median[interquartile range], 8.3[0.0-25.1] vs 22.2[1.0-39.6]; P = 0.018) and lateral decubitus positions (5.2[0.0-16.9] vs 21.3[6.1-38.4]; P = 0.002). As the body position of OSA patients shifted from supine to lateral, the retroglossal space increased significantly (67.3[25.1-116.3] vs 93.3[43.4-160.1]; P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the retropalatal space between the supine and lateral decubitus positions. Conclusions Positional change from the supine to lateral decubitus position expands the upper airway lumen, especially the retroglossal space. Positional OSA may be related to anatomical change of the upper airway lumen based on body position.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据