4.7 Article

Numerical study of foulant-water separation using hydrocyclones enhanced by reflux device: Effect of underflow pipe diameter

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 10-24

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.081

关键词

Enhanced separation; Hydrocyclone; Reflux device; Underflow pipe diameter; Sewage source heat pump

资金

  1. Provincial Science Foundation of Heilongjiang [E2017034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To comprehensively and systematically study effect of the underflow pipe diameter on various performance parameters of the De-Foulant Hydrocyclone with Reflux Device (DFHRD) and understand its mechanism, we proposed a novel DFHRD with underflow pipe diameter of from 0 to twice apex diameter. We investigated the DFHRD with FLUENT software. Specifically, we used the Reynolds Stress Model and the Discrete Phase Model to capture the 3-D strong swirling turbulent flow and predict the particle motion, respectively. Results indicated that: (i) When the underflow pipe diameter was smaller than the apex diameter (e.g., 0-25 mm in this study), both the separation efficiency and split ratio were proportional to the underflow pipe diameter. This was consistent with the acknowledged effect of the underflow pipe diameter. (ii) On the contrary, when the underflow pipe diameter was larger than the apex diameter (e.g., 25-50 mm in this study), both the separation efficiency and split ratio were inversely proportional to the underflow pipe diameter. Reasons were as follows: at this time, increase of the underflow pipe diameter increased the back pressure and axial velocity in the underflow pipe. As a result, circulation eddies were generated and then increased in the underflow pipe. Besides, range of the optimum underflow pipe diameter does exist (e.g., 5-15 nun in this study). Because, only at this time, we could simultaneously achieve the high separation efficiency (69.14%-78.43%) and acceptable split ratio (0-10%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据