4.7 Article

Fabrication and evaluation of GO/TiO2-based molecularly imprinted nanocomposite membranes by developing a reformative filtering strategy: Application to selective adsorption and separation membrane

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 245-254

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.11.042

关键词

GO/TiO2-based nanocomposite; Vacuum filtering method; Molecularly imprinted nanocomposite membranes; Selective rebinding and separation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1507118, 21406085, 21676127]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20180886, BK20171315, BK20151350, BK20161367]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, the GO/TiO2-based molecularly imprinted nanocomposite membranes (GT-MIMs) with high selectivity and constitutionally structural stability were developed by by the incorporation of polydopamine (pDA) membrane modification technique and the simple vacuum filtering method. Instead of constructing imprinted polymers onto pristine membrane surfaces, a versatile filtering strategy was conducted on the membrane surfaces by using GO and TiO2 as the nanocomposite structures. And the GT-MIMs were finally obtained after a twostep-temperature imprinting process by using propranolol as the template molecules. Moreover, attributing to the formation of this membrane-based multilevel nanocomposite surfaces, largely enhanced propranolol-rebinding capacities (53.44 mg/g), permselectivity (separation factors were all more than 16.5) and structural stability (still maintained 92% of the maximum adsorption capacity after 11 cycling operations) were easily achieved. These results strongly illustrated that this GO/TiO2-based imprinting membrane materials would achieve both the high rebinding capacity and the excellent permselectivity. All the synthesis processes were carried out at low temperature and ordinary pressure, which were energy-efficient and environmentally friendly for large-scale application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据