4.5 Article

The December 2018 ML 5.7 and January 2019 ML 5.3 Earthquakes in South Sichuan Basin Induced by Shale Gas Hydraulic Fracturing

期刊

SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 1099-1110

出版社

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0220190029

关键词

-

资金

  1. State Scholarship Fund of China [201804190004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An M-L 5.7 earthquake struck Xingwen County, Sichuan Province, China (28.239 degrees N, 104.922 degrees E) on 16 December 2018. More than two weeks later on 3 January 2019, an ML 5.3 earthquake occurred 8 km to the west. These were the largest and most damaging events in the Changning shale gas block and resulted in extensive damage to nearby farmhouses and other structures. Although the official hypocentral depths for both events are large than 5 km, the centroid moment tensor solutions based on the generated cut-and-paste method were very shallow (3 and 1.8 km for M-L 5.7 and 5.3, respectively). In addition, both events were very close to hydraulic-fracturing (HF) zones of horizontal wells, in which HF was ongoing. A convening chain of evidence, including spatiotemporal correlation between earthquakes and HF zones, statistic parameters of seismicity, and estimated overpressure required to activate the unfavorably oriented source faults of the largest events, suggests that a series of earthquakes were induced by HF at a depth of similar to 2.5-3 km. In the Changning block, thus far, 11 M-L >= 4.0 events (including 3 M-L >= 5.0) were observed since the systematic HF operation began in 2014. The Omori-type aftershock productivity is very low as compared to normal tectonic seismicity. In addition, estimated overpressure ranged from similar to 0.3 to 5.8 MPa for M-w > 3.5 events. The poroelastic stress changes are less than 1 MPa out of the treatment zones. Hence, over-pressure-driven reactivation of pre-existing faults (most of them are unmapped and unfavorably oriented for slip under the present tectonic stress field) is considered to be the cause of these abnormal moderate-size earthquakes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据